Afghanistan vs Rwanda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Afghanistan
3,422 t
in 2050
Rwanda
3,483 t
in 2050
Afghanistan rank
77th
Rwanda rank
75th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Rwanda
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196120052050

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 3,483 t against 3,422 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 61 t.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 77th and Rwanda ranks 75th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1,278 t 12.64 t 1,266 t Afghanistan
1970s 2,223 t 301.01 t 1,922 t Afghanistan
1980s 2,080 t 500.5 t 1,580 t Afghanistan
1990s 1,358 t 698.75 t 659.75 t Afghanistan
2000s 1,806 t 1,866 t 59.8 t Rwanda
2010s 1,613 t 4,548 t 2,935 t Rwanda
2020s 1,110 t 4,831 t 3,721 t Rwanda
2030s 2,861 t 2,558 t 303.13 t Afghanistan
2050s 3,422 t 3,483 t 61.2 t Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Afghanistan or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 3,483 t against 3,422 t in Afghanistan as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Afghanistan and Rwanda?
61 t, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Rwanda?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Afghanistan and Rwanda rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Afghanistan ranks 77th and Rwanda ranks 75th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Rwanda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/afghanistan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/afghanistan/rwanda/">Afghanistan vs Rwanda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).