Antigua and Barbuda vs Saint Lucia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 98th and Saint Lucia ranks 98th of 103 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Antigua and Barbuda or Saint Lucia?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 t against 0 t in Saint Lucia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Lucia?
- 0 t, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1966.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Lucia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 98th and Saint Lucia ranks 98th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).