Australia and New Zealand vs Philippines: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
231,082 t
in 2050
Philippines
316,189 t
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Philippines rank
11th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Philippines
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196120052050

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 316,189 t against 231,082 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 85,107 t.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Philippines ranks 11th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 128,128 t 191,479 t 63,351 t Philippines
1970s 164,710 t 315,196 t 150,486 t Philippines
1980s 201,133 t 226,020 t 24,887 t Philippines
1990s 237,315 t 222,728 t 14,587 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 270,171 t 249,348 t 20,822 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 250,658 t 271,870 t 21,212 t Philippines
2020s 226,721 t 264,836 t 38,115 t Philippines
2030s 265,359 t 297,215 t 31,856 t Philippines
2050s 231,082 t 316,189 t 85,107 t Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Philippines?
Philippines, at 316,189 t against 231,082 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Philippines?
85,107 t, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Philippines?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Philippines ranks 11th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Philippines: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/philippines/">Australia and New Zealand vs Philippines: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).