Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
231,082 t
in 2050
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.35 million t
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
10th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196120052050

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 1.35 million t against 231,082 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.12 million t.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 5.8 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 103 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 128,128 t 321,900 t 193,772 t Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 164,710 t 449,860 t 285,150 t Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 201,133 t 608,057 t 406,924 t Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 237,315 t 612,095 t 374,780 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 270,171 t 680,171 t 410,001 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 250,658 t 764,426 t 513,768 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 226,721 t 823,281 t 596,560 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2030s 265,359 t 1.03 million t 764,291 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2050s 231,082 t 1.35 million t 1.12 million t Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 1.35 million t against 231,082 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
1.12 million t, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/sub-saharan-africa/">Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).