Cabo Verde vs Kenya: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Cabo Verde
1,929 t
in 2050
Kenya
76,872 t
in 2050
Cabo Verde rank
25th
Kenya rank
25th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Kenya
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196120052050

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 76,872 t against 1,929 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 74,943 t.

That makes Kenya's figure about 39.8 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 25th and Kenya ranks 25th of 29 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 650 t 13,207 t 12,557 t Kenya
1970s 650 t 19,007 t 18,357 t Kenya
1980s 581.75 t 27,990 t 27,408 t Kenya
1990s 620.75 t 33,567 t 32,947 t Kenya
2000s 888.62 t 36,030 t 35,141 t Kenya
2010s 1,168 t 50,085 t 48,917 t Kenya
2020s 2,029 t 62,034 t 60,005 t Kenya
2030s 1,457 t 58,053 t 56,596 t Kenya
2050s 1,929 t 76,872 t 74,942 t Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Cabo Verde or Kenya?
Kenya, at 76,872 t against 1,929 t in Cabo Verde as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Cabo Verde and Kenya?
74,943 t, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Kenya?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Cabo Verde and Kenya rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Cabo Verde ranks 25th and Kenya ranks 25th of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Kenya: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/cabo-verde-2/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/cabo-verde-2/kenya/">Cabo Verde vs Kenya: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).