Cabo Verde vs Uganda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Cabo Verde
1,929 t
in 2050
Uganda
93,853 t
in 2050
Cabo Verde rank
25th
Uganda rank
22nd

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Uganda
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196120052050

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 93,853 t against 1,929 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 91,924 t.

That makes Uganda's figure about 48.6 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 25th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 29 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 650 t 13,874 t 13,224 t Uganda
1970s 650 t 19,547 t 18,897 t Uganda
1980s 581.75 t 19,760 t 19,178 t Uganda
1990s 620.75 t 12,155 t 11,534 t Uganda
2000s 888.62 t 21,073 t 20,185 t Uganda
2010s 1,168 t 43,622 t 42,453 t Uganda
2020s 2,029 t 55,297 t 53,268 t Uganda
2030s 1,457 t 55,192 t 53,734 t Uganda
2050s 1,929 t 93,853 t 91,923 t Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Cabo Verde or Uganda?
Uganda, at 93,853 t against 1,929 t in Cabo Verde as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Cabo Verde and Uganda?
91,924 t, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Uganda?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Cabo Verde and Uganda rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Cabo Verde ranks 25th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Uganda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/cabo-verde-2/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/cabo-verde-2/uganda/">Cabo Verde vs Uganda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).