Costa Rica vs Ethiopia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Costa Rica
44,433 t
in 2050
Ethiopia
51,680 t
in 2050
Costa Rica rank
38th
Ethiopia rank
35th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Ethiopia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196120052050

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 51,680 t against 44,433 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 7,247 t.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 38th and Ethiopia ranks 35th of 103 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 5 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 27,897 t 10,871 t 17,026 t Costa Rica
2000s 32,922 t 14,441 t 18,480 t Costa Rica
2010s 39,684 t 17,843 t 21,840 t Costa Rica
2020s 38,287 t 15,580 t 22,707 t Costa Rica
2030s 43,502 t 33,092 t 10,410 t Costa Rica
2050s 44,433 t 51,680 t 7,247 t Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Costa Rica or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 51,680 t against 44,433 t in Costa Rica as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Costa Rica and Ethiopia?
7,247 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ethiopia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2050.
How do Costa Rica and Ethiopia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Costa Rica ranks 38th and Ethiopia ranks 35th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Ethiopia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/ethiopia/">Costa Rica vs Ethiopia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).