Costa Rica vs Sudan (former): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Costa Rica
44,433 t
in 2050
Sudan (former)
39,312 t
in 2011
Costa Rica rank
38th
Sudan (former) rank
41st

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Sudan (former)
020.0k40.0k60.0k196120052050

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 44,433 t against 39,312 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 5,121 t.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 38th and Sudan (former) ranks 41st of 103 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Sudan (former) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Sudan (former) Difference Ahead
1960s 17,868 t 5,409 t 12,459 t Costa Rica
1970s 25,814 t 10,870 t 14,944 t Costa Rica
1980s 30,325 t 37,512 t 7,187 t Sudan (former)
1990s 26,320 t 43,460 t 17,139 t Sudan (former)
2000s 32,922 t 43,557 t 10,635 t Sudan (former)
2010s 36,793 t 41,496 t 4,703 t Sudan (former)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Costa Rica or Sudan (former)?
Costa Rica, at 44,433 t against 39,312 t in Sudan (former) as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Costa Rica and Sudan (former)?
5,121 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sudan (former)?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Costa Rica and Sudan (former) rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Costa Rica ranks 38th and Sudan (former) ranks 41st of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Sudan (former): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/sudan-former/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/sudan-former/">Costa Rica vs Sudan (former): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).