Cuba vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Cuba
350,894 t
in 2050
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.35 million t
in 2050
Cuba rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
10th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Cuba
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196120052050

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 1.35 million t against 350,894 t in Cuba, a difference of 1.00 million t.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 3.9 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 695,869 t 321,900 t 373,969 t Cuba
1970s 815,322 t 449,860 t 365,462 t Cuba
1980s 855,458 t 608,057 t 247,402 t Cuba
1990s 812,324 t 612,095 t 200,230 t Cuba
2000s 419,432 t 680,171 t 260,739 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 270,723 t 764,426 t 493,703 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 213,467 t 823,281 t 609,814 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2030s 343,542 t 1.03 million t 686,108 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2050s 350,894 t 1.35 million t 1.00 million t Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Cuba or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 1.35 million t against 350,894 t in Cuba as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africa?
1.00 million t, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Cuba ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/cuba/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/cuba/sub-saharan-africa/">Cuba vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).