Lebanon vs Yemen: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time
- Lebanon
- Yemen
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Yemen, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yemen ahead.
Lebanon ranks 98th and Yemen ranks 98th of 103 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22.97 t | 325 t | 302.03 t | Yemen |
| 1970s | 11.7 t | 107.25 t | 95.55 t | Yemen |
| 1980s | 44.27 t | 0 t | 44.27 t | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 103.51 t | 0 t | 103.51 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Lebanon or Yemen?
- Lebanon, at 0 t against 0 t in Yemen as of 2050.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Lebanon and Yemen?
- 0 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Yemen?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1997.
- How do Lebanon and Yemen rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
- Lebanon ranks 98th and Yemen ranks 98th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).