Mauritius vs Nepal: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Mauritius
90,401 t
in 2050
Nepal
75,750 t
in 2050
Mauritius rank
23rd
Nepal rank
26th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Mauritius
  • Nepal
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196120052050

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 90,401 t against 75,750 t in Nepal, a difference of 14,651 t.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 23rd and Nepal ranks 26th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 7 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 52,758 t 5,922 t 46,837 t Mauritius
1970s 52,207 t 10,848 t 41,359 t Mauritius
1980s 50,743 t 15,871 t 34,872 t Mauritius
1990s 47,938 t 27,003 t 20,935 t Mauritius
2000s 44,327 t 39,201 t 5,125 t Mauritius
2010s 33,816 t 44,711 t 10,895 t Nepal
2020s 26,109 t 41,977 t 15,868 t Nepal
2030s 68,270 t 56,600 t 11,670 t Mauritius
2050s 90,401 t 75,750 t 14,651 t Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Mauritius or Nepal?
Mauritius, at 90,401 t against 75,750 t in Nepal as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Mauritius and Nepal?
14,651 t, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Nepal?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Mauritius and Nepal rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Mauritius ranks 23rd and Nepal ranks 26th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Nepal: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/mauritius/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/mauritius/nepal/">Mauritius vs Nepal: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).