Mexico vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Mexico
337,317 t
in 2050
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.35 million t
in 2050
Mexico rank
10th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
10th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Mexico
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196120052050

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 1.35 million t against 337,317 t in Mexico, a difference of 1.01 million t.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 4.0 times Mexico's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 10th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 103 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 289,587 t 321,900 t 32,313 t Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 326,252 t 449,860 t 123,608 t Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 359,587 t 608,057 t 248,470 t Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 384,858 t 612,095 t 227,236 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 429,827 t 680,171 t 250,344 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 493,420 t 764,426 t 271,005 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 519,242 t 823,281 t 304,039 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2030s 365,105 t 1.03 million t 664,545 t Sub-Saharan Africa
2050s 337,317 t 1.35 million t 1.01 million t Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Mexico or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 1.35 million t against 337,317 t in Mexico as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Mexico and Sub-Saharan Africa?
1.01 million t, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sub-Saharan Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Mexico and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Mexico ranks 10th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/mexico/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/mexico/sub-saharan-africa/">Mexico vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).