Mozambique vs Sudan: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time
- Mozambique
- Sudan
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 45,123 t against 40,890 t in Sudan, a difference of 4,233 t.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 37th and Sudan ranks 40th of 103 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30,704 t | 46,250 t | 15,545 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 26,026 t | 41,214 t | 15,188 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Mozambique or Sudan?
- Mozambique, at 45,123 t against 40,890 t in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Mozambique and Sudan?
- 4,233 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Sudan rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
- Mozambique ranks 37th and Sudan ranks 40th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).