Northern America vs Uganda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Northern America
222,576 t
in 2050
Uganda
93,853 t
in 2050
Northern America rank
20th
Uganda rank
22nd

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Northern America
  • Uganda
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196120052050

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 222,576 t against 93,853 t in Uganda, a difference of 128,723 t.

That makes Northern America's figure about 2.4 times Uganda's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.

Northern America ranks 20th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 29 groups.

Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern America Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 151,706 t 13,874 t 137,833 t Northern America
1970s 188,490 t 19,547 t 168,942 t Northern America
1980s 206,014 t 19,760 t 186,254 t Northern America
1990s 241,357 t 12,155 t 229,202 t Northern America
2000s 248,710 t 21,073 t 227,636 t Northern America
2010s 235,143 t 43,622 t 191,522 t Northern America
2020s 246,246 t 55,297 t 190,949 t Northern America
2030s 229,286 t 55,192 t 174,094 t Northern America
2050s 222,576 t 93,853 t 128,723 t Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Northern America or Uganda?
Northern America, at 222,576 t against 93,853 t in Uganda as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Northern America and Uganda?
128,723 t, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Uganda?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Northern America and Uganda rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Northern America ranks 20th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern America vs Uganda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/northern-america/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/northern-america/uganda/">Northern America vs Uganda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).