Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Puerto Rico
1,300 t
in 2002
Saint Kitts and Nevis
761.71 t
in 2050
Puerto Rico rank
84th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
85th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196120052050

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 1,300 t against 761.71 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 538.29 t.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.7 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 84th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 103 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 4 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 72,583 t 3,165 t 69,418 t Puerto Rico
1970s 34,592 t 2,630 t 31,962 t Puerto Rico
1980s 15,291 t 2,863 t 12,427 t Puerto Rico
1990s 8,006 t 2,402 t 5,605 t Puerto Rico
2000s 1,430 t 2,249 t 819 t Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Puerto Rico or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Puerto Rico, at 1,300 t against 761.71 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2002.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
538.29 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2002.
How do Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Puerto Rico ranks 84th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/puerto-rico-us/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/puerto-rico-us/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).