Singapore vs Saint Lucia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues
Singapore
0 t
in 1992
Saint Lucia
0 t
in 1966
Singapore rank
98th
Saint Lucia rank
98th
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time
- Singapore
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Singapore ranks 98th and Saint Lucia ranks 98th of 103 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Singapore or Saint Lucia?
- Singapore, at 0 t against 0 t in Saint Lucia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Singapore and Saint Lucia?
- 0 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1966.
- How do Singapore and Saint Lucia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
- Singapore ranks 98th and Saint Lucia ranks 98th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).