Sudan (former) vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Sudan (former)
39,312 t
in 2011
Zimbabwe
34,868 t
in 2050
Sudan (former) rank
41st
Zimbabwe rank
44th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Sudan (former)
  • Zimbabwe
020.0k40.0k60.0k196120052050

How they compare

Sudan (former) currently reports 39,312 t against 34,868 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4,444 t.

That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sudan (former) ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 103 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sudan (former) averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan (former) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 5,409 t 8,064 t 2,655 t Zimbabwe
1970s 10,870 t 14,436 t 3,566 t Zimbabwe
1980s 37,512 t 20,659 t 16,854 t Sudan (former)
1990s 43,460 t 21,306 t 22,154 t Sudan (former)
2000s 43,557 t 26,526 t 17,031 t Sudan (former)
2010s 41,496 t 27,135 t 14,361 t Sudan (former)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Sudan (former) or Zimbabwe?
Sudan (former), at 39,312 t against 34,868 t in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Sudan (former) and Zimbabwe?
4,444 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan (former) and Zimbabwe?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Sudan (former) and Zimbabwe rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Sudan (former) ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan (former) vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/sudan-former/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/sudan-former/zimbabwe/">Sudan (former) vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).