Madagascar vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues … square kilometre Biomass

Madagascar
0.114 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.134 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
43rd
Zimbabwe rank
41st

Sugar cane: Burning crop residues … square kilometre Biomass over time

  • Madagascar
  • Zimbabwe
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.134 t per square kilometre against 0.114 t per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 0.02 t per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 93 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0209 t per square kilometre 0.0208 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 0.0345 t per square kilometre 0.0373 t per square kilometre 0.0028 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0609 t per square kilometre 0.0534 t per square kilometre 0.0075 t per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 0.0694 t per square kilometre 0.0551 t per square kilometre 0.0143 t per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 0.0843 t per square kilometre 0.0686 t per square kilometre 0.0157 t per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 0.1051 t per square kilometre 0.0878 t per square kilometre 0.0172 t per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 0.114 t per square kilometre 0.1273 t per square kilometre 0.0134 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Madagascar or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.134 t per square kilometre against 0.114 t per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Madagascar and Zimbabwe?
0.02 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Zimbabwe rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Madagascar ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/zimbabwe/">Madagascar vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
95 places, 5,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.