Singapore vs Saint Lucia: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues … square kilometre Biomass
Singapore
0 t per square kilometre
in 1992
Saint Lucia
0 t per square kilometre
in 1966
Singapore rank
87th
Saint Lucia rank
87th
Sugar cane: Burning crop residues … square kilometre Biomass over time
- Singapore
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Singapore ranks 87th and Saint Lucia ranks 87th of 93 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Singapore or Saint Lucia?
- Singapore, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Saint Lucia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Singapore and Saint Lucia?
- 0 t per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1966.
- How do Singapore and Saint Lucia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
- Singapore ranks 87th and Saint Lucia ranks 87th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.