Congo vs Sudan: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Biomass) … unit GDP Biomass
Congo
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Congo rank
27th
Sudan rank
24th
Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Biomass) … unit GDP Biomass over time
- Congo
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Congo ranks 27th and Sudan ranks 24th of 92 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Congo or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Congo and Sudan?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Sudan rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
- Congo ranks 27th and Sudan ranks 24th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.