Sudan vs Zambia: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Biomass) … unit GDP Biomass
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Zambia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sudan rank
24th
Zambia rank
23rd
Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Biomass) … unit GDP Biomass over time
- Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zambia ahead.
Sudan ranks 24th and Zambia ranks 23rd of 92 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Sudan or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Sudan and Zambia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
- Sudan ranks 24th and Zambia ranks 23rd of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.