Australia and New Zealand vs Costa Rica: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate
Australia and New Zealand
-1.64 % change on previous year
in 2023
Costa Rica
-1.52 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
67th
Costa Rica rank
65th
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports -1.52 % change on previous year against -1.64 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.12 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 25 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 67th and Costa Rica ranks 65th of 114 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.09 % change on previous year | 6 % change on previous year | 1.92 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 2.61 % change on previous year | 3.66 % change on previous year | 1.06 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 1.68 % change on previous year | -1.25 % change on previous year | 2.92 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1990s | 2.89 % change on previous year | 2.14 % change on previous year | 0.7576 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | -0.4545 % change on previous year | 1.52 % change on previous year | 1.97 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.7205 % change on previous year | 1.07 % change on previous year | 0.354 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | -4.34 % change on previous year | 0.2719 % change on previous year | 4.61 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at -1.52 % change on previous year against -1.64 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Costa Rica?
- 0.12 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Costa Rica?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Costa Rica rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 67th and Costa Rica ranks 65th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.