Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 2.65 % change on previous year against -4.63 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 7.28 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 29 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 25th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.61 % change on previous year | 9.02 % change on previous year | 3.41 % change on previous year | South Africa |
| 1970s | 3.55 % change on previous year | 1.85 % change on previous year | 1.7 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 1.85 % change on previous year | 2.17 % change on previous year | 0.3178 % change on previous year | South Africa |
| 1990s | 0.237 % change on previous year | 2.03 % change on previous year | 1.79 % change on previous year | South Africa |
| 2000s | 1.41 % change on previous year | -1.14 % change on previous year | 2.55 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 2.34 % change on previous year | 0.0195 % change on previous year | 2.32 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | -0.3862 % change on previous year | -0.7578 % change on previous year | 0.3716 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 2.65 % change on previous year against -4.63 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Africa?
- 7.28 % change on previous year, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Africa?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Africa rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 25th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.