Spain vs Saint Lucia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate
Spain
-100 % change on previous year
in 2007
Saint Lucia
-100 % change on previous year
in 1966
Spain rank
105th
Saint Lucia rank
105th
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate over time
- Spain
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Spain currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 105th and Saint Lucia ranks 105th of 114 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate, Spain or Saint Lucia?
- Spain, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Saint Lucia as of 2007.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate between Spain and Saint Lucia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Saint Lucia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1966.
- How do Spain and Saint Lucia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), annual growth rate?
- Spain ranks 105th and Saint Lucia ranks 105th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.