Australia and New Zealand vs Colombia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.6239 kt
in 2050
Colombia
0.7882 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Colombia rank
12th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Colombia
0.20.40.60.811.2196120052050

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.7882 kt against 0.6239 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.1643 kt.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Colombia ranks 12th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Colombia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Colombia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3459 kt 0.4856 kt 0.1397 kt Colombia
1970s 0.4447 kt 0.4616 kt 0.0168 kt Colombia
1980s 0.5431 kt 0.5404 kt 0.0027 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.6408 kt 0.6422 kt 0.0015 kt Colombia
2000s 0.7295 kt 0.6995 kt 0.03 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.6768 kt 0.7556 kt 0.0789 kt Colombia
2020s 0.6122 kt 0.6704 kt 0.0583 kt Colombia
2030s 0.7165 kt 0.8147 kt 0.0982 kt Colombia
2050s 0.6239 kt 0.7882 kt 0.1643 kt Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Colombia?
Colombia, at 0.7882 kt against 0.6239 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Colombia?
0.1643 kt, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Colombia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Colombia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Colombia ranks 12th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Colombia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/colombia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/colombia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Colombia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).