Australia and New Zealand vs Philippines: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.6239 kt
in 2050
Philippines
0.8537 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Philippines rank
11th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Philippines
0.20.40.60.81196120052050

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 0.8537 kt against 0.6239 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.2298 kt.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Philippines ranks 11th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3459 kt 0.517 kt 0.171 kt Philippines
1970s 0.4447 kt 0.851 kt 0.4063 kt Philippines
1980s 0.5431 kt 0.6102 kt 0.0672 kt Philippines
1990s 0.6408 kt 0.6013 kt 0.0394 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.7295 kt 0.6733 kt 0.0562 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.6768 kt 0.7341 kt 0.0573 kt Philippines
2020s 0.6122 kt 0.715 kt 0.1029 kt Philippines
2030s 0.7165 kt 0.8025 kt 0.086 kt Philippines
2050s 0.6239 kt 0.8537 kt 0.2298 kt Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Philippines?
Philippines, at 0.8537 kt against 0.6239 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Philippines?
0.2298 kt, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Philippines?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Philippines ranks 11th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Philippines: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/philippines/">Australia and New Zealand vs Philippines: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).