Australia vs Polynesia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)

Australia
0.6239 kt
in 2050
Polynesia
0.0001 kt
in 2050
Australia rank
13th
Polynesia rank
13th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) over time

  • Australia
  • Polynesia
00.20.40.60.8196120052050

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.6239 kt against 0.0001 kt in Polynesia, a difference of 0.6238 kt.

That makes Australia's figure about 6,239.0 times Polynesia's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 13th and Polynesia ranks 13th of 103 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3459 kt 0 kt 0.3459 kt Australia
1970s 0.4447 kt 0 kt 0.4447 kt Australia
1980s 0.5431 kt 0.0001 kt 0.543 kt Australia
1990s 0.6408 kt 0.0001 kt 0.6407 kt Australia
2000s 0.7295 kt 0.0001 kt 0.7294 kt Australia
2010s 0.6768 kt 0.0001 kt 0.6767 kt Australia
2020s 0.6122 kt 0.0001 kt 0.6121 kt Australia
2030s 0.7165 kt 0.0001 kt 0.7164 kt Australia
2050s 0.6239 kt 0.0001 kt 0.6238 kt Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Australia or Polynesia?
Australia, at 0.6239 kt against 0.0001 kt in Polynesia as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Australia and Polynesia?
0.6238 kt, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Polynesia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and Polynesia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Australia ranks 13th and Polynesia ranks 13th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Polynesia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia/polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia/polynesia/">Australia vs Polynesia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).