Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Bahamas
0.005 kt
in 2050
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0021 kt
in 2050
Bahamas rank
82nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
85th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Bahamas
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.0020.0040.0060.008196120052050

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.005 kt against 0.0021 kt in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0029 kt.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 2.4 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 43 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Bahamas ranks 82nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 103 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0009 kt 0.0084 kt 0.0076 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0024 kt 0.0071 kt 0.0047 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0029 kt 0.0077 kt 0.0048 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0032 kt 0.0065 kt 0.0033 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.004 kt 0.005 kt 0.001 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
2030s 0.0049 kt 0.002 kt 0.0029 kt Bahamas
2050s 0.005 kt 0.0021 kt 0.0029 kt Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Bahamas or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Bahamas, at 0.005 kt against 0.0021 kt in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0029 kt, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
43 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2050.
How do Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Bahamas ranks 82nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).