Cabo Verde vs Mauritius: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)

Cabo Verde
0.0052 kt
in 2050
Mauritius
0.2441 kt
in 2050
Cabo Verde rank
25th
Mauritius rank
23rd

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Mauritius
00.050.10.150.20.25196120052050

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.2441 kt against 0.0052 kt in Cabo Verde, a difference of 0.2389 kt.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 46.9 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 25th and Mauritius ranks 23rd of 29 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0018 kt 0.1425 kt 0.1407 kt Mauritius
1970s 0.0018 kt 0.1409 kt 0.1391 kt Mauritius
1980s 0.0016 kt 0.137 kt 0.1355 kt Mauritius
1990s 0.0017 kt 0.1294 kt 0.1278 kt Mauritius
2000s 0.0024 kt 0.1197 kt 0.1173 kt Mauritius
2010s 0.0032 kt 0.0913 kt 0.0881 kt Mauritius
2020s 0.0055 kt 0.0705 kt 0.065 kt Mauritius
2030s 0.0039 kt 0.1843 kt 0.1804 kt Mauritius
2050s 0.0052 kt 0.2441 kt 0.2389 kt Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Cabo Verde or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.2441 kt against 0.0052 kt in Cabo Verde as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Cabo Verde and Mauritius?
0.2389 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Mauritius?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Cabo Verde and Mauritius rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Cabo Verde ranks 25th and Mauritius ranks 23rd of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Mauritius: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/cabo-verde-2/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/cabo-verde-2/mauritius/">Cabo Verde vs Mauritius: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).