Colombia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)

Colombia
0.7882 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.61 kt
in 2050
Colombia rank
12th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) over time

  • Colombia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
00.511.5196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.61 kt against 0.7882 kt in Colombia, a difference of 0.8218 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.0 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 4 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4856 kt 0.1951 kt 0.2906 kt Colombia
1970s 0.4616 kt 0.3459 kt 0.1157 kt Colombia
1980s 0.5404 kt 0.5078 kt 0.0325 kt Colombia
1990s 0.6422 kt 0.616 kt 0.0262 kt Colombia
2000s 0.6995 kt 0.8439 kt 0.1444 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.7556 kt 1.2 kt 0.4481 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.6704 kt 1.32 kt 0.6521 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 0.8147 kt 1.23 kt 0.4168 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 0.7882 kt 1.61 kt 0.8228 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Colombia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1.61 kt against 0.7882 kt in Colombia as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Colombia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
0.8218 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Colombia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Colombia ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/colombia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/colombia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Colombia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).