Ecuador vs Eswatini: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)

Ecuador
0.1613 kt
in 2050
Eswatini
0.1893 kt
in 2050
Ecuador rank
30th
Eswatini rank
27th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Eswatini
00.050.10.150.20.25196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.1893 kt against 0.1613 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 0.028 kt.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 30th and Eswatini ranks 27th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 8 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1594 kt 0.0192 kt 0.1402 kt Ecuador
1970s 0.1687 kt 0.0298 kt 0.1388 kt Ecuador
1980s 0.1605 kt 0.0592 kt 0.1013 kt Ecuador
1990s 0.1526 kt 0.0686 kt 0.084 kt Ecuador
2000s 0.1569 kt 0.0845 kt 0.0723 kt Ecuador
2010s 0.1799 kt 0.0992 kt 0.0807 kt Ecuador
2020s 0.201 kt 0.1015 kt 0.0995 kt Ecuador
2030s 0.1622 kt 0.1429 kt 0.0193 kt Ecuador
2050s 0.1613 kt 0.1893 kt 0.028 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Ecuador or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.1893 kt against 0.1613 kt in Ecuador as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Ecuador and Eswatini?
0.028 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Ecuador ranks 30th and Eswatini ranks 27th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Eswatini: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ecuador/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ecuador/eswatini/">Ecuador vs Eswatini: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).