El Salvador vs Mozambique: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

El Salvador
0.1401 kt
in 2050
Mozambique
0.1218 kt
in 2050
El Salvador rank
34th
Mozambique rank
37th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • El Salvador
  • Mozambique
0.0250.050.0750.10.1250.15196120052050

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.1401 kt against 0.1218 kt in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0183 kt.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.

El Salvador ranks 34th and Mozambique ranks 37th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 7 and Mozambique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0467 kt 0.0626 kt 0.0159 kt Mozambique
1970s 0.0655 kt 0.0965 kt 0.031 kt Mozambique
1980s 0.0619 kt 0.0509 kt 0.011 kt El Salvador
1990s 0.0975 kt 0.0395 kt 0.058 kt El Salvador
2000s 0.1095 kt 0.0609 kt 0.0486 kt El Salvador
2010s 0.1334 kt 0.0806 kt 0.0528 kt El Salvador
2020s 0.1369 kt 0.0703 kt 0.0666 kt El Salvador
2030s 0.1284 kt 0.092 kt 0.0364 kt El Salvador
2050s 0.1401 kt 0.1218 kt 0.0183 kt El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, El Salvador or Mozambique?
El Salvador, at 0.1401 kt against 0.1218 kt in Mozambique as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between El Salvador and Mozambique?
0.0183 kt, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mozambique?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do El Salvador and Mozambique rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
El Salvador ranks 34th and Mozambique ranks 37th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Mozambique: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/mozambique/">El Salvador vs Mozambique: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).