Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.61 kt
in 2050
South Africa
0.5468 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th
South Africa rank
15th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
00.511.5196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.61 kt against 0.5468 kt in South Africa, a difference of 1.06 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.9 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 15th of 29 groups.

Across the 9 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 8 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1951 kt 0.2611 kt 0.066 kt South Africa
1970s 0.3459 kt 0.3391 kt 0.0067 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 0.5078 kt 0.455 kt 0.0528 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 0.616 kt 0.5023 kt 0.1138 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 0.8439 kt 0.5457 kt 0.2982 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 1.2 kt 0.4624 kt 0.7413 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1.32 kt 0.444 kt 0.8785 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 1.23 kt 0.5797 kt 0.6518 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 1.61 kt 0.5468 kt 1.06 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1.61 kt against 0.5468 kt in South Africa as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
1.06 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 15th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).