Mauritius vs Northern America: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Mauritius
0.2441 kt
in 2050
Northern America
0.601 kt
in 2050
Mauritius rank
23rd
Northern America rank
20th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Mauritius
  • Northern America
00.20.40.60.8196120052050

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 0.601 kt against 0.2441 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.3569 kt.

That makes Northern America's figure about 2.5 times Mauritius's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 23rd and Northern America ranks 20th of 103 countries.

Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Northern America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1425 kt 0.4096 kt 0.2671 kt Northern America
1970s 0.1409 kt 0.5089 kt 0.368 kt Northern America
1980s 0.137 kt 0.5562 kt 0.4192 kt Northern America
1990s 0.1294 kt 0.6517 kt 0.5222 kt Northern America
2000s 0.1197 kt 0.6715 kt 0.5518 kt Northern America
2010s 0.0913 kt 0.6349 kt 0.5436 kt Northern America
2020s 0.0705 kt 0.6649 kt 0.5944 kt Northern America
2030s 0.1843 kt 0.6191 kt 0.4348 kt Northern America
2050s 0.2441 kt 0.601 kt 0.3569 kt Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Mauritius or Northern America?
Northern America, at 0.601 kt against 0.2441 kt in Mauritius as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Mauritius and Northern America?
0.3569 kt, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Northern America?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Mauritius and Northern America rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Mauritius ranks 23rd and Northern America ranks 20th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Northern America: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/mauritius/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/mauritius/northern-america/">Mauritius vs Northern America: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).