Mauritius vs Uganda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)

Mauritius
0.2441 kt
in 2050
Uganda
0.2534 kt
in 2050
Mauritius rank
23rd
Uganda rank
22nd

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Uganda
00.050.10.150.20.25196120052050

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.2534 kt against 0.2441 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0093 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 23rd and Uganda ranks 22nd of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1425 kt 0.0375 kt 0.105 kt Mauritius
1970s 0.1409 kt 0.0528 kt 0.0882 kt Mauritius
1980s 0.137 kt 0.0533 kt 0.0837 kt Mauritius
1990s 0.1294 kt 0.0328 kt 0.0966 kt Mauritius
2000s 0.1197 kt 0.0569 kt 0.0628 kt Mauritius
2010s 0.0913 kt 0.1178 kt 0.0265 kt Uganda
2020s 0.0705 kt 0.1493 kt 0.0788 kt Uganda
2030s 0.1843 kt 0.149 kt 0.0353 kt Mauritius
2050s 0.2441 kt 0.2534 kt 0.0093 kt Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Mauritius or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.2534 kt against 0.2441 kt in Mauritius as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Mauritius and Uganda?
0.0093 kt, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Uganda?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Mauritius and Uganda rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Mauritius ranks 23rd and Uganda ranks 22nd of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Uganda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/mauritius/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/mauritius/uganda/">Mauritius vs Uganda: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).