Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Puerto Rico
0.0035 kt
in 2002
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0021 kt
in 2050
Puerto Rico rank
84th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
85th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.050.10.150.20.25196120052050

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0035 kt against 0.0021 kt in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0014 kt.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.7 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 84th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 103 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 4 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.196 kt 0.0085 kt 0.1875 kt Puerto Rico
1970s 0.0934 kt 0.0071 kt 0.0863 kt Puerto Rico
1980s 0.0413 kt 0.0077 kt 0.0336 kt Puerto Rico
1990s 0.0216 kt 0.0065 kt 0.0152 kt Puerto Rico
2000s 0.0039 kt 0.006 kt 0.0022 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Puerto Rico or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Puerto Rico, at 0.0035 kt against 0.0021 kt in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2002.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0014 kt, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2002.
How do Puerto Rico and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Puerto Rico ranks 84th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/puerto-rico-us/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/puerto-rico-us/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Puerto Rico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).