Antigua and Barbuda vs Saint Lucia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita
Antigua and Barbuda
0 kt per person
in 1992
Saint Lucia
0 kt per person
in 1966
Antigua and Barbuda rank
83rd
Saint Lucia rank
83rd
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 83rd and Saint Lucia ranks 83rd of 93 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per capita, Antigua and Barbuda or Saint Lucia?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Saint Lucia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Lucia?
- 0 kt per person, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1966.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Lucia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per capita?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 83rd and Saint Lucia ranks 83rd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.