Australia vs El Salvador: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita

Australia
0 kt per person
in 2023
El Salvador
0 kt per person
in 2023
Australia rank
11th
El Salvador rank
12th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita over time

  • Australia
  • El Salvador
0000196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in El Salvador, a difference of 0 kt per person.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 11th and El Salvador ranks 12th of 93 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Australia
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Australia
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Australia
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Australia
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Australia
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Australia
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per capita, Australia or El Salvador?
Australia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per capita between Australia and El Salvador?
0 kt per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and El Salvador rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per capita?
Australia ranks 11th and El Salvador ranks 12th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs El Salvador: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-per-capita/australia/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-per-capita/australia/el-salvador/">Australia vs El Salvador: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
95 places, 5,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.