Malawi vs Sudan: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita
Malawi
0 kt per person
in 2023
Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Malawi rank
49th
Sudan rank
50th
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita over time
- Malawi
- Sudan
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 49th and Sudan ranks 50th of 93 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per capita, Malawi or Sudan?
- Malawi, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per capita between Malawi and Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Sudan rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per capita?
- Malawi ranks 49th and Sudan ranks 50th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.