Australia vs Congo: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre CH4

Australia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
57th
Congo rank
55th

Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre CH4 over time

  • Australia
  • Congo
00000196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 57th and Congo ranks 55th of 93 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per square, Australia or Congo?
Congo, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per square between Australia and Congo?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per square?
Australia ranks 57th and Congo ranks 55th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
95 places, 5,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.