Singapore vs Saint Lucia: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre CH4
Singapore
0 kt per square kilometre
in 1992
Saint Lucia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 1966
Singapore rank
83rd
Saint Lucia rank
83rd
Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre CH4 over time
- Singapore
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Singapore ranks 83rd and Saint Lucia ranks 83rd of 93 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per square, Singapore or Saint Lucia?
- Singapore, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Saint Lucia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per square between Singapore and Saint Lucia?
- 0 kt per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1966.
- How do Singapore and Saint Lucia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per square?
- Singapore ranks 83rd and Saint Lucia ranks 83rd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.