Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Lucia: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre CH4

Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2006
Saint Lucia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 1966
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
83rd
Saint Lucia rank
83rd

Sugar cane: Burning crop residues (Emissions) … square kilometre CH4 over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
0000196119832006

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 83rd and Saint Lucia ranks 83rd of 93 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per square, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Saint Lucia?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Saint Lucia as of 2006.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per square between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia?
6 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1966.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions ch4), per square?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 83rd and Saint Lucia ranks 83rd of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Lucia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/st-lucia/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Lucia: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
95 places, 5,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.