Antigua and Barbuda vs Ecuador: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Antigua and Barbuda
-100 % change on previous year
in 1972
Ecuador
-33.33 % change on previous year
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
95th
Ecuador rank
93rd

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Ecuador
-100-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -33.33 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 66.67 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 95th and Ecuador ranks 93rd of 100 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s -21.43 % change on previous year 10.09 % change on previous year 31.52 % change on previous year Ecuador
1970s 0 % change on previous year 2.63 % change on previous year 2.63 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Antigua and Barbuda or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at -33.33 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador?
66.67 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador?
9 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1972.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 95th and Ecuador ranks 93rd of 100 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Ecuador: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/antigua-and-barbuda/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/antigua-and-barbuda/ecuador/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Ecuador: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 7,209 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.