Congo vs Europe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Congo
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Europe
-100 % change on previous year
in 2005
Congo rank
26th
Europe rank
27th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Congo
  • Europe
-100-50050196219922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Europe, a difference of 100 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Europe ahead.

Congo ranks 26th and Europe ranks 27th of 100 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Europe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Europe Difference Ahead
1960s 22.71 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 22.71 % change on previous year Congo
1970s -11.03 % change on previous year 3.33 % change on previous year 14.37 % change on previous year Europe
1980s 18.55 % change on previous year -8.33 % change on previous year 26.88 % change on previous year Congo
1990s -3.27 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 3.27 % change on previous year Europe
2000s 3.57 % change on previous year -50 % change on previous year 53.57 % change on previous year Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Congo or Europe?
Congo, at 0 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Europe as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Congo and Europe?
100 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Europe?
42 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2005.
How do Congo and Europe rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Congo ranks 26th and Europe ranks 27th of 100 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Europe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/europe/">Congo vs Europe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 7,209 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.