Congo vs Martinique: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Congo
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Martinique
0 % change on previous year
in 2006
Congo rank
26th
Martinique rank
26th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Congo
  • Martinique
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Martinique, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 26th and Martinique ranks 26th of 100 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Martinique in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Martinique Difference Ahead
1960s 22.71 % change on previous year -6.37 % change on previous year 29.08 % change on previous year Congo
1970s -11.03 % change on previous year -5 % change on previous year 6.03 % change on previous year Martinique
1980s 18.55 % change on previous year -5 % change on previous year 23.55 % change on previous year Congo
1990s -3.27 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 3.27 % change on previous year Martinique
2000s 5.49 % change on previous year 14.29 % change on previous year 8.79 % change on previous year Martinique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Congo or Martinique?
Congo, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Martinique as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Congo and Martinique?
0 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Martinique?
45 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2006.
How do Congo and Martinique rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Congo ranks 26th and Martinique ranks 26th of 100 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Martinique: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/martinique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/martinique/">Congo vs Martinique: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 7,209 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.