El Salvador vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time
- El Salvador
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0 % change on previous year against -4.52 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 4.52 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 26 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 26th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 23rd of 100 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.58 % change on previous year | 5.66 % change on previous year | 3.08 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 3.25 % change on previous year | 3.53 % change on previous year | 0.2884 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | -1.68 % change on previous year | 1.86 % change on previous year | 3.53 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 11.56 % change on previous year | 0.2142 % change on previous year | 11.34 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 2000s | -1.76 % change on previous year | 1.42 % change on previous year | 3.17 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 2.59 % change on previous year | 2.34 % change on previous year | 0.2511 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 2020s | -0.6746 % change on previous year | -0.3598 % change on previous year | 0.3148 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, El Salvador or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- El Salvador, at 0 % change on previous year against -4.52 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between El Salvador and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 4.52 % change on previous year, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
- El Salvador ranks 26th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 23rd of 100 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.