Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 5.88 % change on previous year against 2.64 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 3.24 % change on previous year.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.2 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 32 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.06 % change on previous year | 22.5 % change on previous year | 13.44 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 5.74 % change on previous year | 5.77 % change on previous year | 0.0301 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 1.73 % change on previous year | 4.1 % change on previous year | 2.38 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 3.36 % change on previous year | 21.04 % change on previous year | 17.68 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 3.72 % change on previous year | -1.92 % change on previous year | 5.64 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2010s | 2.57 % change on previous year | 8.79 % change on previous year | 6.22 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.8819 % change on previous year | 3.03 % change on previous year | 2.15 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 5.88 % change on previous year against 2.64 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 3.24 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.