Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Malawi: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0 % change on previous year against -4.52 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 4.52 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 27 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 23rd and Malawi ranks 26th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.95 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 6.95 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 3.53 % change on previous year | 18.33 % change on previous year | 14.8 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1980s | 1.86 % change on previous year | 7.14 % change on previous year | 5.29 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1990s | 0.2142 % change on previous year | 3.51 % change on previous year | 3.3 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 2000s | 1.42 % change on previous year | 2.52 % change on previous year | 1.1 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 2010s | 2.34 % change on previous year | 1.24 % change on previous year | 1.1 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | -0.3598 % change on previous year | 2.08 % change on previous year | 2.44 % change on previous year | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0 % change on previous year against -4.52 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Malawi?
- 4.52 % change on previous year, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Malawi?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Malawi rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 23rd and Malawi ranks 26th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.