Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.0162 kt
in 2050
Mexico
0.0236 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
13th
Mexico rank
10th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Mexico
0.010.020.030.04196120052050

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.0236 kt against 0.0162 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0074 kt.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Mexico ranks 10th of 103 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.009 kt 0.0203 kt 0.0113 kt Mexico
1970s 0.0115 kt 0.0228 kt 0.0113 kt Mexico
1980s 0.0141 kt 0.0252 kt 0.0111 kt Mexico
1990s 0.0166 kt 0.027 kt 0.0104 kt Mexico
2000s 0.0189 kt 0.0301 kt 0.0112 kt Mexico
2010s 0.0175 kt 0.0345 kt 0.017 kt Mexico
2020s 0.0159 kt 0.0364 kt 0.0205 kt Mexico
2030s 0.0186 kt 0.0256 kt 0.007 kt Mexico
2050s 0.0162 kt 0.0236 kt 0.0074 kt Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Mexico?
Mexico, at 0.0236 kt against 0.0162 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
0.0074 kt, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Mexico rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Mexico ranks 10th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/">Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).