Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)

Australia
0.0162 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.0418 kt
in 2050
Australia rank
13th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) over time

  • Australia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
00.010.020.030.04196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0.0418 kt against 0.0162 kt in Australia, a difference of 0.0256 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.6 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 13th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 103 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.009 kt 0.0051 kt 0.0039 kt Australia
1970s 0.0115 kt 0.009 kt 0.0026 kt Australia
1980s 0.0141 kt 0.0132 kt 0.0009 kt Australia
1990s 0.0166 kt 0.016 kt 0.0006 kt Australia
2000s 0.0189 kt 0.0219 kt 0.003 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.0175 kt 0.0312 kt 0.0137 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.0159 kt 0.0343 kt 0.0184 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 0.0186 kt 0.0319 kt 0.0133 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 0.0162 kt 0.0418 kt 0.0256 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Australia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0.0418 kt against 0.0162 kt in Australia as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
0.0256 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Australia ranks 13th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).